Hepatitis C Virus Micro-elimination Among People With HIV in San Diego: Are We on Track?

Background: Rising incidence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among people with HIV (PWH) in San Diego County (SDC) was reported. In 2018, the University of California San Diego (UCSD) launched a micro-elimination initiative among PWH, and in 2020 SDC launched an initiative to reduce HCV incidence by 80% across 2015-2030. We model the impact of observed treatment scale-up on HCV micro-elimination among PWH in SDC. Methods: A model of HCV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) and men who have sex with men (MSM) was calibrated to SDC. The model was additionally stratified by age, gender, and HIV status. The model was calibrated to HCV viremia prevalence among PWH in 2010, 2018, and 2021 (42.1%, 18.5%, and 8.5%, respectively), and HCV seroprevalence among PWID aged 18-39 years, MSM, and MSM with HIV in 2015. We simulate treatment among PWH, weighted by UCSD Owen Clinic (reaching 26% of HCV-infected PWH) and non-UCSD treatment, calibrated to achieve the observed HCV viremia prevalence. We simulated HCV incidence with observed and further treatment scale-up (+/- risk reductions) among PWH. Results: Observed treatment scale-up from 2018 to 2021 will reduce HCV incidence among PWH in SDC from a mean of 429 infections/year in 2015 to 159 infections/year in 2030. County-wide scale-up to the maximum treatment rate achieved at UCSD Owen Clinic (in 2021) will reduce incidence by 69%, missing the 80% incidence reduction target by 2030 unless accompanied by behavioral risk reductions. Conclusions: As SDC progresses toward HCV micro-elimination among PWH, a comprehensive treatment and risk reduction approach is necessary to reach 2030 targets.

Single-center experience evaluating and initiating people with HIV on long-acting cabotegravir/rilpivirine.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience evaluating and initiating individuals on long-acting injectable (LAI) cabotegravir/rilpivirine (CAB/RPV) and evaluate factors associated with starting LAI CAB/RPV and reasons for not starting. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective single-center study at the UC San Diego Owen Clinic. METHODS: We included all individuals who expressed interest in treatment with LAI CAB/RPV between April 2021 and June 2022 who had a definitive decision made on starting LAI CAB/RPV. RESULTS: In total, 383 individuals were included with 201 (52.5%) initiating LAI CAB/RPV. Those who initiated LAI CAB/RPV were younger ( P  = 0.02) and were more likely to be on a two-drug regimen or first-generation integrase inhibitor regimen and less likely to be on a protease inhibitor or multiclass regimen. The most common reasons for not starting LAI CAB/RPV were inconsistent clinic attendance or difficulty being contacted and patient choice not to start. Of those who had a proviral DNA resistance test as workup for LAI CAB/RPV ( n  = 135), 18.5% had a resistance mutation identified that may have impacted the activity of LAI CAB/RPV. CONCLUSION: Despite novel challenges over half of our cohort initiated LAI CAB/RPV. Evaluating for potential non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance is an important part of the workup for LAI CAB/RPV and proviral DNA resistance testing can be an additional tool to identify potential resistance.

Impact of switching to tenofovir alafenamide on weight gain as compared to maintaining a non-tenofovir alafenamide containing regimen.

ABSTRACT: Evaluate the impact of switching to an anti-retroviral regimen containing tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) on weight and the development of metabolic complications compared to remaining on a non-TAF containing regimen.Single-center retrospective case-control study.We evaluated people living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) who were on an anti-retroviral regimen not containing TAF and were switched to a regimen containing TAF between January 1, 2016 and September 30, 2018. The control group included PLWH on a TAF free regimen throughout the study period. The primary outcome was change in weight from baseline to 12 months postswitch. Secondary outcomes included percent change in weight, change in body mass index (BMI), change in BMI class, and new diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia (HLD) during the study period.PLWH switched to TAF (n = 446) demonstrated significantly greater mean increase in weight compared to the control group (n = 162) (1.97 vs 0.88 kg, P = .01), however the effect was only seen in those switched from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. Those that switched to TAF also had a significantly higher percent increase in weight, increase in BMI, and BMI class. We observed a higher rate of new diagnosis of HLD in the control group compared to the TAF switch group during the study period.PLWH switched to TAF had greater increases in weight after 1 year as compared to those continuing on a TAF free regimen. However, this did not translate to higher rates of obesity related illnesses such as diabetes, hypertension, and HLD during the follow up period.

Screening for Sexually Transmitted Infections During Hepatitis C Treatment to Predict Reinfection Among People With HIV.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the risk of hepatitis C virus (HCV) reinfection among people with HIV (PWH) in the direct-acting antiviral (DAA) era. We evaluate HCV reinfection rates in the DAA era and characterize presustained virologic response (SVR) behavioral risk factors associated with reinfection among PWH at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD). METHODS: Observational longitudinal cohort of PWH treated with DAAs between 2014 and July 2019 who achieved SVR and had at least 1 subsequent HCV viral load measurement. HCV reinfection was defined as new HCV viremia after SVR. We examined whether screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and substance use during the pre-SVR period could identify patients at greater risk for reinfection using exact Poisson regression to compare reinfection incidence rates between those with and without pre-SVR STIs and positive urine drug screens. RESULTS: Eight out of 200 PWH were reinfected with HCV a median ~26 weeks after SVR over 328.1 person-years of follow-up (PYFU), for an incidence rate of 2.44/100 PYFU. The observed HCV reinfection rate was highest among men who have sex with men who inject drugs (MSM IDU; 4.63/100 PFYU) and those aged 30-39 years (6.80/100 PYFU). Having a positive gonorrhea/chlamydia test during the pre-SVR period was a predictor of HCV reinfection. CONCLUSIONS: The HCV reinfection rate in the DAA era is similar to the rate observed in the interferon era in San Diego in PWH. STI screening during HCV treatment may help determine those at higher risk for HCV reinfection.

Tenofovir alafenamide and rifabutin co-administration does not lead to loss of HIV-1 suppression: A retrospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) is a preferred nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor used in the treatment of HIV. Co-administration of TAF with rifabutin (RFB) is not recommended due to concerns that RFB decreases TAF gastrointestinal absorption. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy regimens that include the co-administration of TAF and RFB. METHODS: Persons with HIV (PWH) who received TAF-RFB co-administration for ≥1 month were identified retrospectively. The primary outcome was the maintenance of HIV viral load <200 copies/mL (cpm) for those already on HIV therapy at RFB initiation, or suppression of viral load to <200 cpm for those with unsuppressed HIV viral load prior to TAF-RFB co-administration. RESULTS: Twenty-two PWH met the inclusion criteria. Four out of five patients (80%) maintained a viral load <200 cpm and 15/17 (88%) achieved a viral load <200 cpm during TAF-RFB co-administration. After the exclusion of patients who self-discontinued therapy or were lost to follow-up, 19/19 (100%) met the combined primary endpoint of HIV viral load <200 cpm. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that TAF-RFB co-administration may be effective despite concerns that RFB could reduce TAF absorption.

The Role of the Clinical Pharmacist in the Management of People Living with HIV in the Modern Antiretroviral Era.

As the HIV epidemic has evolved, so too has the role of the clinical pharmacist (CP) in the management of people living with HIV (PLWH). The modern antiretroviral therapy (ART) era has resulted in PLWH living normal life spans with resulting increased comorbidities. CPs have long been a part of the multidisciplinary management of ART. However, with the changing demographics of PLWH and health-care system dynamics, CPs have had the opportunity to expand their role. This includes involvement in managing increasing comorbidities with expanding and more complicated medication regimens, drug interaction monitoring, and optimizing transitions of care, all while recognizing and addressing barriers to successful HIV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. In addition, with the expansion of HIV prevention and pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) services, CPs have the opportunity to be involved in HIV prevention. This study summarizes the literature evaluating the impact of CPs in the management of PLWH in the era of modern ART. We conducted a literature search to identify studies that assessed the CP role in HIV clinical practice since 2006. The identified studies were grouped into two categories. The first was HIV related outcomes, including interventions on regimen selection, adherence, regimen optimization, and management of treatment failure. The second group of studies pertained to aging and vulnerable populations, including management of comorbidities, transitions of care, medication-assisted treatment, hepatitis C, and HIV screening and PrEP. We concluded that the evidence supports the expanding role of CPs to positively impact a variety of aspects related to the care of PLWH.

Treatment of hepatitis C with direct-acting antivirals significantly reduces liver-related hospitalizations in patients with cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND: The availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) for the treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) has resulted in the ability to safely and effectively treat patients with cirrhosis and end-stage liver disease. However, information is limited with regard to the impact of DAA treatment on inpatient health-related resource utilization in patients with advanced HCV-related cirrhosis. We aimed to ascertain the impact of DAA treatment on the frequency of liver-related hospitalizations and associated costs in patients with cirrhosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis carried out at a single US reference center that compared patients with HCV cirrhosis according to treatment status: the untreated group (January 2011 to December 2013) and the DAA-treated group (January 2014 to March 2017). The primary outcome was the difference in the incidence rate of liver-related hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included differences in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplant, and all-cause mortality. We calculated the projected savings per-patient treated per-year on the basis of calculated hospitalization rate stratified by Child-Turquotte-Pugh (CTP) score. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between the untreated (n=182) and DAA-treated (n=196) cohorts. Mean follow-up time in the untreated and treated cohort was 20.4 and 17.7 months, respectively. The incidence rates of liver-related hospitalizations were 29.1/100 and 10.4/100 person-years of follow-up (P≤0.0001) in the untreated and treated cohorts, respectively. This was accounted for by a decreased incidence of hospitalizations in patients with CTP-A (75.8%) and CTP-B (64.5%), but not CTP-C. CONCLUSION: Successful DAA treatment reduces hospitalization rate and resource utilization costs in patients with CTP-A and CTP-B, but not in those with CTP-C.